Thursday, December 9, 2010

Learning Grammar

Learning vocabulary can be integrated with multiple forms of input like pictures, graphs, illustrations, video, sound and acting it out. However, with grammar, not as many visual forms of input can be implemented. For example, showing the meaning of "in," "on" and "at" through pictures and video is a very tough task to accomplish (however, there are exceptions including specific vocabulary and grammar lessons involving TPR). Although studies show that vocabulary and grammar is best learned/retained via deeper levels of processing, the methods in which we go about teaching each can quite be different.

For me, learning grammar is best done by myself when I can analyze patterns and similarities/differences between the target language and English. However, class instruction is also integral so I can clear up any misunderstandings. Whenever we were taught grammar and asked to repeat seconds after it was introduced, it never stayed in my head as long as it would if I worked with by myself for a while.

As a teacher, I would like to use more explicit instruction than implicit instruction especially for the types of grammar that seem complicated to students and need more time to explain. By using grammar via context (children's stories, poetry, newspaper, etc.) or natural discourse, I would like to demonstrate how the full range of the grammar can be utilized. Also, we can introduce grammar one aspect at a time, keep meaning in focus (meaningful principle), use both oral and written input, use processing instruction, conscious raising, co-constructive tasks, and more.

Just like everything we teach in the classroom, we always have to use multiple strategies that engage the students while keeping individual learner differences in mind (such as field-dependent and field-independent learners).

No comments:

Post a Comment